The Heterocomposicion of Collective Labor Negotiations: Analysis of Facultative Arbitration in the last few years

Authors

  • Mauro Ugaz Olivares Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la Universidad Católica del Perú. Profesor de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y de la Escuela de
    Post Grado de la Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas. Experto en Derecho Laboral. Miembro de la Sociedad Peruana de
    Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Socio de Human Capital en Ernst & Young Perú. Miembro Extraordinario de la Asociación Civil IUS ET VERITAS.
  • Rosa Valeria Osorio Véliz Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    Bachiller de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Keywords:

Labor Collective Bargaining, Facultative Arbitration, Right to Strike, Uncaused Arbitration, Provenance Causative, Negotiable Behaviors Redefinition

Abstract

This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compare the effects of the strike concept variation on the qualification of this like legal or illegal and its relationship with the emergence of Facultative Arbitration that, as an exceptional measure, complement the collective negotiation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-23

How to Cite

Ugaz Olivares, M., & Osorio Véliz, R. V. (2015). The Heterocomposicion of Collective Labor Negotiations: Analysis of Facultative Arbitration in the last few years. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(51), 298–312. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15665

Issue

No. 51 (2015)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2016 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.