The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202101.010Keywords:
Arbitration, Awards, Annulment of awards, Third parties, Judicial Power, Constitutional jurisprudence, Comparative jurisprudence, PeruAbstract
The virtues of arbitration depend on the principle of judicial non-interference in its proceedings and on a limited regime of subsequent judicial control of arbitrations. However, there is a lot of confusion about the articulation of the different procedural control channels applicable to arbitrations, the timing of their activation and their scope. Article 3 of the Arbitration Act establishes the principle of judicial non-interference, but it needs to be understood within the entire framework of existing procedural defenses. For these purposes, the history of national and comparative jurisprudence plays an extremely relevant role.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2021-07-14
How to Cite
Velásquez Meléndez, R., & Chang Tokushima, J. (2021). The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law. IUS ET VERITAS, (62), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202101.010
Issue
Section
General Section


.png)
.png)