The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law

Authors

  • Raffo Velásquez Meléndez Baxel Consultores https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-5959

    Magíster en Argumentación Jurídica por la Universidad de Alicante y la Università degli studi di Palermo; Posgrado en Arbitraje Comercial Internacional por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Abogado por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Socio de Baxel Consultores. Correo electrónico rvelasquez@baxel.pe.

  • Juan Chang Tokushima Baxel Consultores https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-6897

    Magíster en Economía, Regulación y Competencia de los Servicios Públicos, por la Universidad de Barcelona. Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Socio de Baxel Consultores. Correo electrónico: jchang@baxel.pe.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202101.010

Keywords:

Arbitration, Awards, Annulment of awards, Third parties, Judicial Power, Constitutional jurisprudence, Comparative jurisprudence, Peru

Abstract

The virtues of arbitration depend on the principle of judicial non-interference in its proceedings and on a limited regime of subsequent judicial control of arbitrations. However, there is a lot of confusion about the articulation of the different procedural control channels applicable to arbitrations, the timing of their activation and their scope. Article 3 of the Arbitration Act establishes the principle of judicial non-interference, but it needs to be understood within the entire framework of existing procedural defenses. For these purposes, the history of national and comparative jurisprudence plays an extremely relevant role.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Velásquez Meléndez, R., & Chang Tokushima, J. (2021). The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law. IUS ET VERITAS, (62), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202101.010