The Plea of State of Necessity: A palatable normative framework for extraterritorial self-defense against Non-State Actors

Authors

  • Moisés Montiel Mogollón Ibero-American University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9042-4098

    LL.B. (Universidad Central de Venezuela), LL.M. (Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University). Adjunct Professor of Treaty Law (Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico) and Law of Armed Conflict (Universidad Panamericana, Mexico). Managing Partner at Lotus Soluciones Legales (Mexico City, Mexico).
    Email address: mmontiel@up.edu. mx.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202102.001

Keywords:

Self-Defense, Non-state Actors, State responsibility, State of Necessity, United Nations Security Council

Abstract

The UN Charter law governing self-defense is inadequate to address emerging modalities of armed violence caused by non-State actors located in the territory of non-consenting third States. This paper offers an alternative grounded in the state of necessity as a circumstance excluding wrongfulness as per the law of State responsibility. The contention is that in integrating the rationale behind necessity as an excuse for non-performance of obligations and the conditions and processes under article 51 of the UN Charter, the law allows for an exercise of extraterritorial self-defense against non-State actors which safeguards the territorial State’s sovereignty and the need for a legal alternative of defense for the defending State without toeing the line of aggression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-11-26

How to Cite

Montiel Mogollón, M. (2021). The Plea of State of Necessity: A palatable normative framework for extraterritorial self-defense against Non-State Actors. IUS ET VERITAS, (63), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202102.001