Correlational study: verbal creativity and personality according to the Big Five Model in Brazilian students

Authors

  • Tatiana de Cássia Nakano Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas
    Docente do curso de pós-graduação stricto sensu em Psicologia da Pontifícia UniversidadeCatólica de Campinas. Contato: tatiananakano@hotmail.com
  • Priscila Zaia Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas
    Doutoranda em Psicologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Contato: priscilazaia@gmail.com
  • Karina da Silva Oliveira Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas
    Doutoranda em Psicologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Endereçopostal: Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da PUC-Campinas. Avenida JohnBoyd Dunlop, s/n. Jardim Ipaussurama – Campinas / SP, Brasil. CEP 13060-904. Contato: karina_oliv@yahoo.com.br

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201601.005

Keywords:

personality traits, statistical correlation, aptitude, verbal creativity

Abstract

In Brazil, few studies are found investigating the relationship between creativity and personality constructs, especially considering the Big Five Model. This study investigated a sample of 83 Brazilian high school students, between ages 14 and 18 years (M = 16.01, SD = 0.95) that answered two questionnaires, the Torrance Thinking Creatively with Words (Brazilian version) and the Bateria Fatorial de Personalidade (Factorial Battery of Personality). 
The results indicated significant correlations only between the socialization factor and twoverbal creative indexes (ICVI = .26; ICVII = .26). In the present study the investigated constructs are weakly related. The influence of the instrument and the theoretical modeladopted in the findings is discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

Nakano, T. de C., Zaia, P., & Oliveira, K. da S. (2016). Correlational study: verbal creativity and personality according to the Big Five Model in Brazilian students. Revista De Psicología, 34(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201601.005

Issue

Section

Articles