The annulment of the award due to its reasoning in Peru – how to face a distorted way

Authors

  • Gino Rivas Caso Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    Abogado. Adjunto de docencia en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Miembro del Club Español de Arbitraje.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201702.013

Keywords:

Arbitration, Corruption, Due Process, Annulment Remedy, Professional Ethics

Abstract

Judicial review of the awards in Peru is in practice problematic and incomprehensible. Even though the law expressly forbids the judicial analysis of the reasoning of the award, in reality more than the half of proceedings for setting aside an award are based on objections to its reasoning. In view of this situation, it is essential to understand which are the “defects” in the reasoning that renders void the award, in order to not commit them. This paper seeks to propose guidelines that allows arbitrators to avoid the annulment of the award due to its reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-11

How to Cite

Rivas Caso, G. (2017). The annulment of the award due to its reasoning in Peru – how to face a distorted way. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (72), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201702.013

Issue

No. 72 (2017): Derecho Mercantil

Section

Misceláneas

License

Copyright (c) 2017 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.