¿“Neoinca” o colonial? la “muerte” de la arquitectura inca y otros paradigmas

Authors

  • Stella E. Nair University of California, Riverside

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.005

Keywords:

Indigenous architecture, Spanish conquest, Chinchero, Neoinca, Colonial

Abstract

"Neo-Inca" or Colonial? The Death of Inca Architecture and other Paradigms

Most indigenous architectural traditions are believed to have ended abruptly with the European invasion of the Americas. In the Andes, scholars have argued that Inca architecture ceased soon after the arrival of the Spaniards and was rapidly replaced with European models. In this paper, I argue that the perceived death of Inca architecture is a false paradigm based on a variety of factors, such as a split in scholarly disciplines, a lack of scholarship on indigenous post contact architecture, and —most importantly— naming practices that have carried mistaken assumptions about the past. Focusing on Chinchero, the private estate of Thupa ‘Inka, as a case study, this paper demonstrates that Inca architecture continued well after the Spanish invasion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2003-04-10

How to Cite

Nair, S. E. (2003). ¿“Neoinca” o colonial? la “muerte” de la arquitectura inca y otros paradigmas. Boletín De Arqueología PUCP, (7), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.005