Chicha aesthetics: New forms of popular creativity in Lima at the beginning of the XXI century

Authors

  • Arturo Quispe Lázaro Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-5119

    Licenciado y egresado de la Maestría de Sociología por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Magíster en Historia del Arte por la Universidad Mayor de San Marcos.
    Correo electrónico: aquispel@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202101.004

Keywords:

Chicha aesthetics, Sociology of culture, Chicha music, Sociology of art, Art and society

Abstract

In Lima, new forms of artistic creation that come from the popular sphere have been produced since the beginning of the 21st century. Creations that come from the environment of Peruvian tropical music called chicha music. A significant first step was the change in the design and composition of the chicha poster, from advertising tropical music parties to one that conveyed ideas. In this way, it was connected with other popular and city spaces, becoming a diversity of creative proposals that were called chicha aesthetics. Why in a city like Lima, cosmopolitan, highly interconnected and globalized, does an artistic-cultural production of a popular nature emerge and generate impact from the environment of tropical chicha music? What characteristics does this aesthetic have and what relationship does it establish with ancestral culture in a highly interconnected context? These are some of the questions that we will address in this article, focused on Lima, the first two decades of this century. The methodology is inductive, we have selected a pictorial corpus of existing creations, finally we proposed a taxonomy that allowed us to analyze chicha aesthetics as contemporary artistic expression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-11-16

How to Cite

Quispe Lázaro, A. (2021). Chicha aesthetics: New forms of popular creativity in Lima at the beginning of the XXI century. Debates En Sociología, (52), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202101.004