Apparent enmity: The tension between the concept of serious human rights violations of the Inter-American Court with criminal law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008Keywords:
Serious violations of human rights, Criminal guarantees, Access to justice, Transitional justice, Due processAbstract
From the judgment of the Barrios Altos case vs. Peru, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights began to develop the concept of «serious violations of rights» and their consequences in the national criminal sphere. Despite being a consolidated standard, nowadays there are still doubts about what acts should be classified under such legal category and if it is correct to limit certain procedural and criminal guarantees in order to achieve their criminalization. This paper explains these controversies in order to propose a legal solution that avoids impunity and ensures the legitimacy of the legal system.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-05-29
How to Cite
Lengua Parra, A., & Ostolaza Seminario, V. E. (2020). Apparent enmity: The tension between the concept of serious human rights violations of the Inter-American Court with criminal law. Derecho PUCP, (84), 224–269. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008
Issue
Section
Main Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Derecho PUCP

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.