Obligation of negotiation and facultative arbitration as part of constitutional law content on collective negotiation

Authors

  • Guillermo Boza Pró Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3741-9062

    Profesor y jefe del Departamento Académico de Derecho de la PUCP, abogado por la PUCP y doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Sevilla. correo electrónico: gboza@pucp.edu.pe.

  • Ernesto Aguinaga Meza Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-070X

    Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP, Lima-Perú, abogado por la PUCP y máster en Estudios Avanzados en Derechos Humanos por la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. correo electrónico: a19967049@pucp.edu.pe.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.011

Keywords:

collective negotiation, duty to negotiate, claim, permission, facultative arbitration, good faith, peaceful means to settle disputes

Abstract

This work studies constitutional bases of two essential institutions of Collective Labor Law: employer’s obligation to negotiate collectively and facultative arbitration. In relation to the first one, using tools provided bythe Theory of Law, it is argued that the section 28º of Peruvian Constitution establishes a collective negotiation concept as claim (not as permission) so, employers legal obligation of collective negotiation is constitutional. In theother hand, regarding facultative arbitration, it has constitutional support on state’s obligation to promote pacific ways to labor conflicts; even though, it is questioned that a «sub constitutional» rule has restrictively regulated this institution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-11-21

How to Cite

Boza Pró, G., & Aguinaga Meza, E. (2013). Obligation of negotiation and facultative arbitration as part of constitutional law content on collective negotiation. Derecho PUCP, (71), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.011