The dilemma to complaint: a critique of the Transfer of functions from Indecopi to Susalud in respect of medical and insurance services

Authors

  • Enzo Segovia Trocones Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Alumno del último ciclo de pregrado en la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. El presente artículo fue elaborado para publicarse en una revista académica como parte del curso de Metodología de la Investigación Jurídica, con la asesoría del profesor Alejandro Moscol Salinas.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201801.018

Keywords:

Regulation, health, public administration, infringement, claim

Abstract

In this article, the author analyzes the distribution of functions between SuSalud and Indecopi, regarding the mandates of Legislative Decree 1158. In particular, the author addresses the functions of administrative regulation related to infractions in the provision of health services by the private sector in our national scope.

This is done taking into account considerations that are inherent to a fundamental right as the right to health, which implies an active duty for the State as a whole. This is the reason why intense criticisms are raised about the way in which the distribution of functions has been regulated among public administration bodies, through confusing rules that signifi cantly increase the costs faced by consumers to present their complaints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-03

How to Cite

Segovia Trocones, E. (2018). The dilemma to complaint: a critique of the Transfer of functions from Indecopi to Susalud in respect of medical and insurance services. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (73), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201801.018

Issue

No. 73 (2018): Historia del Derecho y Derecho Comparado

Section

Misceláneas

License

Copyright (c) 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.