The Inquiry Commissions and the Differences between the Tineo Cabrera & Toledo’s Judgments

Authors

  • César Landa Arroyo Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad Alcalá de Henares
    de España. Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP. Ex magistrado y ex Presidente del Tribunal Constitucional.

Keywords:

Inquiry Commissions, Judgments, Accuracy Content, Prior and Detailed Notification, Banking Secrecy, Democracy

Abstract

The present article addresses the issue about the differences between the Tineo Cabrera and Toledo´s precedents, which is about the clarifications made by the Constitutional Court concerning the fundamentals rights like prior and detailed notification and lifting banking secrecy made in assembly parliamentary. Likewise, give its opinion about the inquiry commissions performance and the improvements that must be implement to its objective actuation and non-arbitrary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-23

How to Cite

Landa Arroyo, C. (2015). The Inquiry Commissions and the Differences between the Tineo Cabrera & Toledo’s Judgments. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(51), 390–396. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15670

Issue

No. 51 (2015)

Section

Puntos de Vista

License

Copyright (c) 2016 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.